Tidskrift för lärarutbildning och forskningThe Spider: Connecting learning object repositories – strategies, technologies and issues - av Fredrik Paulsson, Umeå universitet | Artikelns titel: | The Spider: Connecting learning object repositories – strategies, technologies and issues | | Författare: | Fredrik Paulsson, Umeå universitet | | Publicerad i: | Tidskrift för lärarutbildning och forskning | | Nr, årgång: | 3-4/2008 | | Tidskriften knuten till: | Umeå Universitet | |
Länk till artikeln/tidskriften Tidskriftens hemsida med mer informationAbstract: The rapid growth of digital learning resources
(sometimes referred to as Learning Objects) has
brought forward a number of issues concerning
availability, distribution and use. Issues that are
a mix of interplaited technological and pedagogical
considerations. Some of those issues,
mainly related to repositories and the distribution
of digital learning resources, are described
and examined in this article. A particular focus
is put on how resources can be described and
indexed using metadata, and on how access to
digital learning resources can be improved and
facilitated through federation and/or harvesting
of metadata in order to tie several repositories
together to provide a service that offers
one single entry point for access. The study also
examined how this single point of entry can be
moved closer to the user (i.e. to the environment
where digital learning resources are intended to
be used) through simple federation of the service,
enabling access to the network of repositories from any virtual learning environment. The
study is carried out through experiments connected
to a real-life case. The study concludes
in several suggestions for how access to digital
learning resources can be enhanced, as well as in
the identifications of a couple of new issues that
need to be addressed by future research.
The amount of digital learning resources are
increasing rapidly and a huge amount of commercial
as well as open educational resources
(OER) are now available. However, this rapid
growth of digital learning resources also
means that it becomes harder and harder to
get an overview and to search and find suitable
digital learning resources. At the best, digital
learning resources (or metadata describing
hem) are stored in a repository. While repositories
can be a good approach to indexing and
cataloging digital learning resources, they also
introduces a couple of new problems that need
to be addressed: – Descriptions of digital learning resources
need to be made according to a common
standard and/or Application Profile (Heery &
Patel, 2003) in order to be useful in a broader
context.
– Repositories tend to become isolated islands
that are often not indexed by general search
engines like Google. This also means that
users need to perform there searches in several
different places in order to cover several
repositories. To do this they need to be aware
of where to find the different repositories.
– Repositories tend to be separated from the
rest of the virtual learning environment
(VLE) instead of becoming a transparently
integrated part of the VLE. This is mainly
a problem that is related to how VLEs are
designed and implemented, discussed in
(Paulson, 2008), but that, never the less,
needs to be solved.
The Spider3 project was set out to address the
problems described above from a general perspective.
Hence, the methodologies applied by
the Spider should be applicable in other, similar
cases, as well as being applicable to repositories
for digital learning resource in general.
The remainder of this paper will describe how
the above problems were addressed and how the solutions were designed and implemented
in order to develop a broker service for learning
resource repositories: the Spider.
The first part of the paper briefly describes the
objectives, intentions and deliverables of the
Spider project. The second part of the paper
reviews some previous and related research, as
well as similar projects. The third part of the
paper describes how the problems described
above were addressed and how the resulting solutions
were designed and implemented. Finally,
the paper ends with a brief discussion of the
research presented in the paper and some suggestions
for future research directions to solve
some of the new and unsolved issues that were
encontered during the project.
|